Complete technical bid evaluations in hours, not days.
Raven uses AI to read your purchaser documents, build a structured requirement basis, check every vendor offer, and prepare the comparison, deviations, and technical questions.
For EPCs, engineering consultancies, and owner project-engineering teams.
Every evaluation starts with the same manual reading.
Vendor formats change. The engineering work does not.
Read every requirement
Engineers work through MRs, specifications, datasheets, and referenced documents line by line.
Compare every offer
Vendor offers, datasheets, performance curves, and attachments arrive in different formats and must be aligned by hand.
Find what needs an answer
Deviations, omissions, and open points become technical questions before the bid can move forward.
See every requirement against every vendor.
Raven brings the purchaser requirement basis and vendor responses into one comparison. Deviations and omissions become clear, and the technical questions follow from them.
Confirm the NPSH margin at rated duty and provide the supporting curve.
Vendor B offers API Plan 52. The purchaser specification requires Plan 53B.
One requirement basis. Every vendor checked against it.
Build the requirement basis
Raven's AI reads the MR, datasheets, project specifications, and relevant referenced documents, then extracts the requirements into a structured, source-linked basis.
Evaluate every vendor offer
It reads vendor bids, datasheets, performance curves, exceptions, and attachments, then maps each response to the same requirement basis.
Prepare the TBE and TQs
You receive the parameter-by-parameter comparison, deviations, omissions, technical questions, and evaluation in your format.
Your engineers spend their time on the decision.
Less preparation time
Senior engineers start from a completed comparison instead of building one cell by cell.
Faster evaluations
The first evaluation and each revised offer can move in hours instead of days.
One case across disciplines
Mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, process, and quality teams work from the same requirements, vendor responses, and revision history.
The comparison stays connected to the documents.
Each extracted requirement and vendor response links to its source page. Revisions remain visible, and your engineer makes the final technical decision.
See what Raven produces from a real TBE case.
We can show you a completed evaluation, or start with one of your current vendor cases.
See a completed evaluation
