Skip to main content
Projects & EPC

Complete technical bid evaluations in hours, not days.

Raven compares your specification with every vendor offer, identifies deviations and omissions, and prepares the technical questions and evaluation.

For EPCs, engineering consultancies, and owner project-engineering teams.

Purchaser specification142 requirements
Vendor AVendor BVendor C
Evaluation prepared3 offers compared
8 deviations 5 questions
The work today

Every evaluation starts with the same manual reading.

Vendor formats change. The engineering work does not.

Read every requirement

Engineers work through specifications, datasheets, and referenced documents line by line.

Compare every offer

Each vendor uses a different format, so values are copied into a common comparison by hand.

Find what needs an answer

Deviations, omissions, and open points become technical questions before the bid can move forward.

The evaluation

See every requirement against every vendor.

Raven brings the specification and vendor responses into one comparison. Deviations and omissions become clear, and the technical questions follow from them.

RequirementSpecificationVendor AVendor BVendor CFinding
Rated flow220 m³/h220 m³/h210 m³/h220 m³/hVendor B deviates
NPSH margin≥ 1.0 m1.2 mNot stated0.7 mOne omission, one deviation
Mechanical sealAPI Plan 53BPlan 53BPlan 52Plan 53BVendor B differs
MaterialSS316 wetted partsSS316SS304SS316Vendor B differs
Technical questions preparedTQ-04

Confirm the NPSH margin at rated duty and provide the supporting curve.

Deviation for decisionDEV-08

Vendor B offers API Plan 52. The purchaser specification requires Plan 53B.

How it works

Documents in. Evaluation ready.

01

Send the documents

Start with the purchaser specification, datasheets, and vendor offers you already have.

02

Raven builds the comparison

Raven extracts the requirements, aligns vendor responses, and identifies deviations and omissions.

03

Receive the evaluation

You get the comparison, technical questions, and open decisions in the format your team uses.

What changes

Your engineers spend their time on the decision.

Less preparation time

Senior engineers start from a completed comparison instead of building one cell by cell.

Faster evaluations

The first evaluation and each revised offer can move in hours instead of days.

More bid capacity

The same engineering team can evaluate more vendor offers without adding the same manual workload.

Piloted on a pump case with an international EPC.The evaluation covered the purchaser requirements and multiple vendor offers.
Trust and control

The comparison stays connected to the documents.

Raven uses AI to read and compare the technical documents. Each finding links to the relevant specification clause and vendor page. Revisions remain visible, and your engineer makes the final technical decision.

Source page beside each finding Vendor revisions kept in the same case Final technical decision stays with your engineer

See what Raven produces from a real TBE case.

01One package evaluated
02Every package on the project, by us or by your team in Raven
03Standing evaluations as the bids arrive
See a completed evaluation